Confession. As much as I believe that attending a "Worship Service" is of little real value, I do attend frequently. In fact, for the past 2 years or more I have been a regular part of a "worship team." It's a bit of a struggle, as I like to make music, BUT singing and being in a "Worship Service" has little to do with how I spend time with or for God. The church I attend was perplexed when I explained I could not "become a member" and even more so when I explained I really shouldn't be a "worship leader." It's hard to explain my issues without presenting a viewpoint that may seem a bit dismissive of many of the things congregants hold dear. Regarding membership, I had to explain that my beliefs do not conform to the standards required for membership. As for "leading," I explained that my beliefs would likely eventually lead to me saying something in front of the congregation that would offend ("this is bes...
I grew up listening to "Contemporary Christian" music as a kid, back when some of it was actually good music, and not just repetitive praise-and-mind-control music. Off-topic kind-of rant: I enjoy MAKING music. I'll happily play keyboards or drums in a "praise" band, but I'm fairly confident that the push for "better worship" is really a push for "mood control." When I listen to the lyrics of most "praise"music, it all sounds like this to me. My family has been in and out of churches; leaving whenever the push for "better worship" overpowers the intended focus of what this post is supposed to be about. I enjoy a band named "King's X." They wrote a song called " Mission " The lyrics include: Who are these people behind the stained glass windows Have they forgotten just what they came here for Was it salvation or "scared of hell" Or an assembly of a social get-together What's the mis...
Short answer. He wouldn't. There's that answer He gives regarding taxes that sums it up fairly clearly; "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar 's." Longer answer? He would vote for Love. He taught Love. He showed Love. He shared Love. He defined Love. He is Love. So - who would He vote for (if He really *HAD* to make a choice)? He would support candidates who are models of Love. He would know their heart. I know that seems unfair. But we can also know the hearts of mankind. He would not base His decision on candidate's words, but their deeds, life experiences, and reactions to the world around them. He would vote for the candidate who typifies a loving response in nearly every situation. He would support Love. If you vote, vote for the candidate who: acknowledges the suffering of others. appreciates the hardships and struggles of every human. models a heart of compassion. models a heart of empathy. cries out for the downtrodden. embraces the human conditio...
Comments
Post a Comment